Monday, May 27, 2013

CHART OF THE DAY: This Chart Comparing Caterpillar To Citi Shows How The US Is Kicking China's Butt

The chart below, via BofA Merrill Lynch strategist Michael Hartnett, provides an interesting visualization of one of the big themes playing out in global markets right now.

Bloomberg TV anchor Scarlet Fu called this her "single best chart" this morning.

Citigroup, one of America's largest banks and something of a poster child for the global financial crisis, is taking back ground against Caterpillar, the global construction machinery giant seen as a bellwether for global growth, particularly in China.

The chart underscores both the outperformance of the U.S. economy relative to the rest of the world that everyone is buzzing about and concurrent fears over a global growth slowdown in general, a story in which China plays a central role.

Chart of the day shows assets tied to us real estate outperforming those tied to china real estate, may 2013BofA Merrill Lynch Global Investment Strategy, Bloomberg

Please Note: Business Insider will never share your information with any other companies. You also have the ability to unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time simply by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Matthew Boesler on Twitter. Tags: Global Economy, Chart Of The Day, Citi, Caterpillar | Get Alerts for these topics »

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

x

The Chart of the Day widget displays the latest published chart from Business Insider. To embed, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here

Miners Have Bigger Issues Than Gold Prices

Aaron Levitt

It’s getting rough out there for gold bugs.

After the price of gold crossed the $1,900 mark per ounce back in 2011 — mostly fueled by fears of hyper-inflation and the undoing of the global economy — the precious metal has fallen hard in recent weeks. But nothing hit as hard as this weekend’s wraparound trading days.

Gold prices plunged roughly 4% last Friday, only to suffer a much bigger 12.6% loss when the market opened on Monday. That massive drop has many investors questioning the metal’s portfolio appeal and status as a safe haven.

Those same questions have extended to the gold miners as well.

This makes sense, given that gold miners’ profits increase and decrease with the rise and fall of gold prices. However, it’s not just the plunging cost of gold investors need to worry about when it comes to the miners. There’s a whole laundry list of issues to consider.

Part of the appeal of betting on the miners rather than physical gold or futures pricing is that the miners’ production cost structure — often with considerable fixed expenses — allows them to act as a leveraged play on rising gold prices. The spread between where gold is trading at and what it costs to dig the metal out of the earth is pure profit. And over the last few years, as gold has surged, that spread has been quite juicy.

Lately, though, not so much.

Mining companies finally are beginning to report “all-in sustaining costs” during earnings reports. Previously, the firms only used so-called “cash costs,” based on a standard developed in the 1990s. This metric excluded expenses like exploration budgets and waste rock removal, among others.

For example, the two biggest gold producers by market cap — Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX) and Goldcorp (NYSE:GG) — spent an average of $941 in the fourth quarter to dig up an ounce of gold. That compares to $626 in reported cash costs. Using this new metric, investors are able to get a better understanding of the risks and rising costs facing gold producers.

And things aren’t exactly pretty.

First, fuel and energy costs continue to rise. Mining takes an awful lot of energy to complete, including grid-based electricity for smelters and diesel fuel for generators and equipment. In fact, the mining sector consumes about a third of Chile’s total power output.

In the face of all that power demand, energy costs have been surging. Depending on the nation, diesel fuel costs have increased anywhere between 100% and 500% for miners since 2003. Meanwhile, the cost of electricity has jumped an average of 20% in that time frame.

Of course, that’s assuming miners can get reliable energy at all.

Mines in South Africa have been plagued with severe power outages. The worst was in back in 2008, when work at several miners gold operations — including major producers AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Harmony Gold (NYSE:HMY) — was stopped for several days. This prompted many mining companies operating in South Africa to begin investing in their own power generation facilities. Again, that results in higher costs and lower profit margins for producers.

Labor costs have also been rising. Wages have been rising rapidly since 2003, accounting for more than 50% of mining companies’ costs. And many producers have been forced to shell out above-inflation pay increases in recent years as workers have “taken to the streets.” Again, South Africa has been the heart of the recent labor movements, but those strikes have spread to other gold producing areas in Latin America.

Finally, gold miners have to contend with higher royalty rates, taxes and the threat of resource nationalization. As gold prices have surged, many governments have increased their share of the profits from firms mining on their soil.

Recently, the Dominican government made moves to review and change a contract with Barrick over the development of a $4 billion mine, while Burkina Faso has amended royalty and tax regimes. Tanzania — Africa’s third largest gold producer — is another example. That nation enacted wide-sweeping legislation back in 2010 that increased the royalty rate by a full percentage point. That might not seem like much, but every dollar counts when profit margins are already shrinking.

Some nations have taken this a step further and have been confiscating mines. Crystallex International‘s (PINK:CRYFQ) Las Cristinas project in Venezuela is a prime example. The mine is one of the largest undeveloped gold deposits in the world; however, moves by the Venezuelan government to nationalize natural resource production in the country quickly sent Crystallex to penny stock status.

Given falling gold prices, it’s easy to see why the miners have fallen even harder than gold itself. As production costs continue to rise, many of these firms are going to find themselves in hot water for the next few years. Analysts now predict that many will scale back production and cut dividends if gold falls any further.

For investors, the sector could become a value in due time. However, that time isn’t now. The best decision might be to stay away or short the sector — via a vehicle like the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 3X Shares (NYSE:DUST) — at least in the near term.

As of this writing Aaron Levitt did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

Article printed from InvestorPlace Media, http://investorplace.com/2013/04/miners-have-bigger-issues-than-gold-prices/.

©2013 InvestorPlace Media, LLC


View the original article here

Quicksilver’s Shale Deal Is a Game-Changer

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Wall Street Sorts Through Another Round of Linn-Sanity

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Cyprus Sets Up Big-Time Energy Bargains

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

The Best 5 Energy ETFs for Your Portfolio

fund185Since their introduction in the early 1990s, the simple experiment of an “index fund that behaves like a stock” has completely revolutionized investing for both institutional and retail portfolios. Because, as InvestorPlace Editorial Assistant Alyssa Oursler pointed out recently, exchange traded funds are a great way to get a lot of stock or bond diversification for not a lot of dough.

More and more money managers and individual investors have thus been making the switch from mutual fund holdings to ETFs. In fact, in the U.S. alone, over $2 trillion of assets sit in ETFs and their exchange traded note (ETN) cousins. And if you add up all the funds across the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia, there are more than 4,700 different ETFs available to choose from.

Of course, such a staggering number does make it difficult to pick just the right ETF — especially in certain sectors of the market. For example, my personal portfolio stomping ground — the energy sector — has nearly 27 different funds to choose from.

Heck, that number jumps to almost 80 if you include those tracking energy commodities, master limited partnerships and those companies involved in renewable energy.

Luckily, I’ve already sorted through the stack for you to find the very best options. Here are the top five energy ETFs to consider for your portfolio.

Article printed from InvestorPlace Media, http://investorplace.com/2013/03/the-best-5-energy-etfs-for-your-portfolio/.

©2013 InvestorPlace Media, LLC


View the original article here