Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Central Banks May Finally Be Losing Control

Why are stocks, bonds, and commodities all looking weak?

Ever since the release of the April employment report on May 3 – which came in better than the market expected, as evidenced by the big sell-off in U.S. Treasuries that ensued – all anyone has been talking about is the dreaded "taper."

Because the Federal Reserve is by far the biggest player in the Treasury market, the concern is that when it makes the eventual decision to taper back the pace of the bond purchases it makes under its open-ended quantitative easing program, markets could destabilize as a result.

And thanks to the Fed's introduction of the historic Evans rule in December, which ties the timetable for reversing monetary stimulus directly to numerical thresholds for unemployment and inflation, the Treasury market has become increasingly more sensitive to economic data releases in 2013. When labor market releases like the employment report bear a positive surprise, bonds tend to get crushed.

Sure enough, since the release of the April employment report on May 3, the bond market rally that began in mid-March has reversed, and Treasury yields have shot up to their highest levels in over a year.

tapering keyword countBusiness Insider/Matthew Boesler, data from Bloomberg

10-year yields fall 43 basis points to 1.63% on May 2 from 2.06% on March 11 before reversing and rising 54 basis points to 2.24% on June 11.

The sell-off in U.S. Treasuries has had profound implications around the world.

Across emerging markets, currencies, sovereign debt, and equities are taking a bath as the U.S. dollar strengthened on rising yields and U.S. economic comeback bets. At the same time, China released disappointing economic data, further stoking fears that the commodity supercycle so many emerging economies rely on was indeed coming to an end.

But the real story is how the turmoil in the Treasury market has hit Japan – which is conducting a risky economic experiment of its own – and in turn, how what's happening in Japan is now hitting Europe.

In early April, the Bank of Japan launched the largest central bank bond buying program ever (relative to the size of its economy). The program is intended to pin yields on Japanese government bonds (JGBs) at such low levels that Japanese investors will reallocate a greater portion of their portfolios, but because of the way it has been implemented, it's had the exact opposite effect – yields have been going up.

The size of the bond purchases the Bank of Japan is making, combined with the infrequent and sporadic nature of the purchase schedule, has overwhelmed the JGB market.

"Although the BoJ's easing measures were aimed at absorbing duration and keeping yields stabilized at low levels, at this point, all they are doing is injecting volatility into the market," said BofA Merrill Lynch interest rate strategists Shogo Fujita and Shuichi Ohsaki last month.

In other words, Japanese markets had already found themselves in a precarious situation even before the earthshaking Treasury sell-off that began following the release of the April U.S. employment report in early May.

And it wasn't just the JGB market. For months, Japanese equities had been racing higher, making Japan one of the hottest stock markets in the world. And the yen had been tanking against the U.S. dollar since September, when the experimental "Abenomics" stimulus program began to come into the market's view.

Indeed, around the world, market volatility (especially in currencies) – the traditional nemesis of central bankers and policymakers everywhere – was rising.

Yet despite this, these same policymakers – the Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (G20) – came out in April and endorsed the Bank of Japan's actions.

Russ Certo, who heads interest rate trading at Brean Capital described the G20's April statement on Japan as "shocking."

"I just didn't understand. Policymakers came back and actually advocated support for what the Bank of Japan was doing," said Certo. "And what the Bank of Japan was doing was creating multiple standard deviation moves in different asset classes, which typically at almost all costs was reviled – against the tide of what policy generally tries to achieve."

Why, then, did world policymakers endorse the Bank of Japan's actions?

Perhaps it's because they welcomed the flood of liquidity BoJ easing would bring to global markets.

Certo describes the quantitative easing program launched by the BoJ in April as the "cherry on top of the global central bank policy scheme that had co-existed for years ... a finality to policy, almost."

And some of the biggest beneficiaries of the BoJ stimulus in global markets outside Japan, Certo argues, have been peripheral eurozone sovereign bonds in countries like Spain and Italy (i.e., "the things that we've all been worried about ... the sovereign Europe stuff that people priced in as a credit risk").

Most would agree. "Peripherals – and the European market in general – are benefiting from extraordinary support from the Fed and the BoJ," say Deutsche Bank economists Mark Wall and Gilles Moec. "The global compression in the yields of risk-free assets makes peripheral bonds attractive, via the displacement of core countries’ investors in search for yields."

In May, though, with the onset of the rise in Treasury yields sparked by better-than-expected employment data and resulting fears over Fed tapering, things began to take a turn in the other direction.

On May 9, as improving U.S. economic data and rising U.S. Treasury yields sent the dollar higher, the dollar-yen exchange rate finally broke through the crucial ¥100 level.

The breach of ¥100 sparked a sharp sell-off in the JGB market as exotic currency derivatives called power reverse dual currency swaps (PDRCs) were triggered in Japan, causing a wave of hedging activity in the rates market.

Despite the concerning increase in JGB yields and volatility, the yen continued to weaken against the dollar and Japanese stocks continued to rise, suggesting that everything was still under control for the moment.

Indeed, the dollar-yen exchange rate has become the quintessential yardstick for both the success of Japan's policy experiment and the global liquidity situation.

Fast forward to May 22. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, when asked whether the Fed might begin tapering back stimulus by Labor Day (September 2) in a testimony before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, said, "I don't know. It's going to depend on the data."

Beholden to the data, thanks to the introduction of the Evans rule in December.

The S&P 500 fell 1.9% from its intraday high before Bernanke's comments to close down 0.8% on the day, and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield shot up 11 basis points to 2.04%. "Taper" talk reached a crescendo.

The next day, the Japanese stock market plummeted 7.3%. The dollar-yen exchange rate reversed violently as the yen strengthened. And Europe got wrecked.

"When you see a reversal in dollar-yen, the first thing you should link – if you're a global macro player that has the capacity to enter these transactions – would be to look at peripheral Europe," said Certo.

Last Thursday, the strong-dollar trade was tested again after ECB President Mario Draghi gave a press conference on ECB monetary policy that rung a hawkish tone in the market (another sign that global liquidity was decreasing). The euro soared higher against the dollar on his comments, and the yen did the same.

Since May 22, the Nikkei 225 has fallen 15%, the Euro Stoxx 50 is off 6%, and the S&P 500 is down 1%.

Meanwhile, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury is up 17 basis points, while Italian and Spanish government bond yields are up 44 and 48 basis points, respectively. In Japan, 10-year yields are flat from May 22 levels, but have been extremely volatile.

And the dollar has fallen 6% against the yen.

"In our mind, the single most important accomplishment of the Fed over the past four years is having engineered a dramatic decline in the volatility of long-term interest rates," says BofA Merrill Lynch Head of Global Rates & Currencies Research David Woo.

Now, that's all changing. Are central bankers finally starting to lose control of their most powerful policy instrument, the long-term interest rate?

That's one way to look at it. One could also assert that central banks are still very much in control, but are simply encouraging the sell-off.

Deutsche Bank's Wall and Moec argue that Mario Draghi may be doing just that, for political reasons:

When asked about the decision by the European Commission to allow France two more years to comply with its deficit target, Draghi was very critical – implicitly – of the fact that Paris was not responding to the push for more reforms. The ECB went as far as to say that countries should not get “too optimistic about the present market condition; don’t interpret the present market condition as one that would allow any protracted relaxation of fiscal standards without undertaking structural reforms at the same time, without increasing competitiveness”.

We link this to Draghi’s speech last Sunday when he reminded his audience that OMT was there to protect against redenomination risk, not necessarily to compress spreads to the current levels. The central bank seems to be ready to live with higher yields in Europe, if that is what it takes to deal with governments’ free riding.

Yet regardless of Draghi's intentions or what is playing out in Europe, the biggest debate in the marketplace still surrounds the Federal Reserve's tapering plans (we may get more insight after the Fed's FOMC monetary policy meeting next week).

That's why the U.S. Treasury volatility market is really the only one that matters anymore.


View the original article here

The Australian Dollar Is Sinking Like A Stone

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post.

Another day, another decline for the Aussie dollar, which has fallen below 94 cents against the US dollar.

The latest bout of selling comes after a weekend of very poor Chinese data, which shows falling external trade.

The Australian dollar is one of hedge funds' favorite currencies to short, thanks to weak commodity prices, and a weakening Chinese economy, which are of course related ideas.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question » Tags: Australia | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Booz Allen Has Fired Edward Snowden And Says His Salary Was Only $122,000

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. In an updated statement on their website, security firm Booz Allen have announced that they have fired NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The statement is below, with the updated information in bold:

Booz Allen can confirm that Edward Snowden, 29, was an employee of our firm for less than 3 months, assigned to a team in Hawaii. Snowden, who had a salary at the rate of $122,000, was terminated June 10, 2013 for violations of the firm’s code of ethics and firm policy. News reports that this individual has claimed to have leaked classified information are shocking, and if accurate, this action represents a grave violation of the code of conduct and core values of our firm. We will work closely with our clients and authorities in their investigation of this matter.

Interestingly, that salary is considerably lower than the $200,000 salary that Snowden had mentioned to the Guardian.

The contractor, which makes 98% of its revenue from government contracts, had confirmed Snowden was an employee on Sunday. The company's stock got slammed in the opening on Monday.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Adam Taylor on Twitter.
Ask Adam A Question » Tags: NSA, Edward Snowden | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog. Adam Taylor is International Editor at Business Insider

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

The Government Should Finally Release Fannie And Freddie From Its Custody


View the original article here

Small Business Confidence Back To Second-Highest Level Since Recession

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. Rob Wile | Jun. 11, 2013, 8:33 AM | 50 |

The National Federation of Independent Business' monthly confidence report edged up 2.3 points in May to hit 94.4, the second-highest level since December 2007.

But the index showed growth may be stalling as planned job creation fell one point and reported job creation stalled.

Here's the full chart. We're basically suck at that ~94 level:

And here's who gained:

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Rob Wile on Twitter. Tags: Small Business, Confidence | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Markets Are Going Lower

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. It's a fairly quiet day.

The big news so far is that the Bank of Japan, at its meeting, declined to take any further stimulus measures for now.

Japan ended down 1.45%.

Other markets are falling as well. US futures are modestly lower, while Italy is down by 0.75%, France is off by 0.75%, and Germany is lower by 0.73%.

Shanghai remains closed for Holiday, but for a reflection of sentiment towards China (which came out with bad data over the weekend) the Aussie dollar continues to sink like a song, falling below 94 cents against the dollar.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question » Tags: Markets | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

The Market Is Getting Pounded

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. Quick heads up: The market is open and it's not pretty.

The Dow is off 151.

The S&P and the NASDAQ are both off about 1.2%.

This comes amid some serious weakness in Europe (Italy off 2.4%). Emerging markets are getting hammered.

Japan fell 1.5% after no more action from the Bank of Japan.

In general, ugly day on pretty much every front.

For a good background on the factors driving the market lower, see Mohamed El-Erian on the sucking sounds that are getting louder and louder.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question » Tags: Markets | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Government Bonds Around The World Are Getting Destroyed Today

The sell-off in government bonds has gone completely global as concerns over Federal Reserve tapering of monetary stimulus infect the market.

Everywhere this morning, bond yields are up huge as investors dump sovereign debt.

In the United States, the 10-year yield is up 6 basis points to 2.26%, its highest level in over a year.

In the eurozone, French 10-year yields are up 5 basis points to 2.23%, Germany is up 3 basis points to 1.63%, Italy is up 15 basis points to 4.43%, and Spain is up 14 basis points to 4.471%.

Portuguese 10-year yields are up 37 basis points to 6.49%, and Greek yields are up 93 basis points to 10.28%.

Elsewhere in the developed world, the Japanese 10-year yield is up 5 basis points to 0.88%, Canada is up 5 basis points to 2.25%, Australia is up 11 basis points to 3.40%, and Switzerland is up 10 basis points to 0.84%.

Moving to emerging markets, Brazilian 10-year yields are up 14 basis points to 4.03% Mexico is up 14 basis points to 3.46%, Russia is up 15 basis points to 3.90%, and Turkey is up 31 basis points to 4.53%.

Treasuries and emerging market bonds have been selling off in recent sessions, but today, it definitely looks like the purge is accelerating.

Meanwhile, stocks are selling off globally as well. The Japanese Nikkei closed down 1.5% overnight following the latest Bank of Japan policy meeting.

In Europe, stocks have been heading lower all morning and most are trading near their lows of the day. Spain is down 2.7%, and Italy is down 1.7%. France is down 1.9%, and Germany is down 1.7%.

"Stocks across [Europe] are taking a shellacking to the tune of around 2% as rising German bund yields prompt accelerated losses for government bonds around the periphery," says Miller Tabak Chief Economic Strategist Miller Tabak in an email this morning. "Yields on Spanish and Italian debt are rising to the highest in six weeks. The loss of last week’s lows for equity markets is all too much to bear in most cases and the resilient tone appears to have been snapped like a twig."

Commodities are getting hit, too. WTI crude oil is down 1.3%, while Brent crude is down 1.5%, and NYMEX gasoline is down 1.3%., Gold is 1.2% lower, silver is down 1.5%, and platinum is down 1.3%. Agricultural commodities are all in the red with the exception of corn and soybeans, which are both flat.

In the United States, S&P 500 futures point to an open down 0.9%.

Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar is 1.9% lower against the Japanese yen, and the euro is down 0.1% against the dollar.


View the original article here

The 3 Things That Are Causing Emerging Markets To Get Slammed

If you're just waking up, then you'll see that emerging markets are getting routed again.

Whether its Thai stocks, Brazilian bonds, or the South African Rand (its currency) investors are dumping it all.

This is a complex topic, and there are some idiosyncrasies that make each country different from another (of course), but there are 3 big themes.

The first one is the rise in US interest rates.

For the first time in awhile, real US 10-year interest rates (which is nominal interest rates adjusted for inflation) have turned positive.

fredgraphFRED

More importantly than the fact that they've turned positive is the fact that there's just been a big spike in US real rates.

Money flows to where interest rates are high or rising. When real rates in the US were collapsing, that pushed a wall of liquidity out into the emerging world looking for yield. Now that things are reversing, that wall of liquidity is coming back, being sucked out of the emerging world, causing all of the ructions we're seeing.

The next factor is the slowdown in China. Many emerging markets are in some way levered to exports to China.

The China slowdown is one of the big stories of the year (confirmed with weak data over the weekend) and so this continues apace.

And then finally, there's the commodity slowdown, which is related to the China slowdown.

A lot of emerging markets are commodity players.

As you can see, it's been a rough several months for commodity prices (as the generic chart of the CRB commodity index shows below) and this takes a toll on these economies.

There are many more stories in all of this, but these are the big themes to watch.


View the original article here

Emerging Markets In Asia Got Routed Last Night

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. Indonesia Stock Exchange Jakarta Composite IndexAP

The big story in global markets is the overall rout in emerging markets.

Currencies have been getting slammed. Government bonds prices in local currencies have been getting worked. And equities have really stunk.

Last night was particularly bad for emerging Asia.

A few of the ugly points on the scoreboard.

Thailand fell 4.5%.

Jakarta lost 3.9%.

The Philippines lost 4.6%.

Meanwhile, India is down another 1%, as the Rupee remains near all-time lows against the dollar.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question » Tags: Asia | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Indian Rupee Hits Record Low Against Dollar

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post.

The Indian rupee plunged to a record low of 58.98 per dollar on Tuesday.

The Reserve Bank of India is reported to have intervened and sold U.S. dollars to stem the rupee's decline.

The rupee has fallen about 5.6% against the dollar in the past month.

This is part of the overall selloff in everything related to emerging markets.

But in a report out last week, Deutsche Bank's Taimur Baig and Kaushik Das wrote that the rupee will rally against the greenback in the second half of the year. 

"Four times since 2008 there have been instances of fears about the rupee-dollar exchange rate’s disorderly movement," Baig and Das write. "Each time, the episodes were triggered by the rupee heading toward another all-time low against the USD."

In 2008 and 2013 the rupee's depreciated along with other global currencies, while in 2011 and 2012 they were driven by India's "own vulnerabilities."

They base this call on 5 key things 1. Inflation is declining. 2. The current account deficit is "likely to correct substantially." 3. The outlook for inflows is positive. 4. Global risk aversion is likely to ease off. 5. "The rupee is appropriately valued, with both the real and nominal effective exchange rates having corrected considerably in recent years."

Here's a look at how the rupee has traded against the dollar in the past month:

INRUSDGoogle Finance

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Mamta Badkar on Twitter.
Ask Mamta A Question » Tags: India, Rupee | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Monday, July 29, 2013

Stocks Go Flat

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. Not much going on in U.S. markets today, as there were no major economic data releases this morning.

However, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield did hit its highest level in over a year this morning, at 2.22%.

Meanwhile, after a small upward move earlier, stocks have retraced their gains, and the S&P 500 is now flat on the day.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Matthew Boesler on Twitter. Tags: Stock Market | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Low Volatility Investing Strategies Got Crushed In May

Low volatility had a bad month in May, and there has been a slew of commentary on this.  See Abnormal Returns here for a bunch of links.

Deutsche Bank's 'The Quant View' by Rochester Cahan summarized the month's performance by noting  that

'Last month we argued that the Low Volatility/High Dividend Yield trade was looking crowded, and cautioned that this could indicate elevated downside risk. It turns out that call was prescient.' 

"Could" and "change in probability" means nothing, because it's consistent with anything, eg, if the rate rises it's hardly testable because the old and new probability are couched merely as possibilities, and if the probability doesn't change, that's in the forecast too ('could').  Now if they said, don't buy or short strategy X this month, that would have been prescient.  I wonder if such people realize how disingenuous this is, or if they think their nuance is actually highly rigorous analysis.

In any case, last month was very bad for low volatility strategies, leading many researchers to reassess the validity of this approach.  But, to put it in perspective, here's the total return over the past 12 months, using my beta data.

Clearly the past year, higher beta has been the better place to be, while lower beta has not.  As the SP500 rose 26% from May 31 2012 through May 31 2013, this is not surprising: on average, over shorter horizons like years, betas are accurate, so higher beta stocks do better in rising markets, lower beta portfolios underperform. For example, over the past year, given the SP500 rose 26%, low beta stocks rose 70% of that, high beta 170% of that, implying betas of 0.7 and 1.7, which is totally consistent with the simple CAPM for the high beta stocks, and better-than-expected for the low beta portfolio (ie, its beta was 0.6 in that period).  If you bought low vol stocks not understanding this, well, you really need to.

Now, many people seem to infer from this that low vol/beta has been a bad bet over the past year. If you evaluate yourself purely against the indices, this is true: deviations from the benchmark are only good if they are above the benchmark.  Yet, in simple Sharpe ratio or Information ratio, high beta portfolio did poorly, even in this period.  The clear winner is actually a Beta-1.0 portfolio, which has the highest Sharpe and Information ratio.  Like low volatility, I have championed the beta 1.0 portfolio for a while, and I'm sure it will be a big fund someday.

Stats on US portfolios, 5/31/12-5/31/13

usdataFalkenblog

Internationally we see the same thing: low vol did worse in raw returns, but much better in a pure Sharpe.

intdataFalkenblog

See data here.  I think this highlights a profound truth, that as a practical matter investors don't care about Sharpe ratios as much as returns relative to the benchmark.


View the original article here

STOCKS GO NOWHERE: Here's What You Need To Know

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. Absent any major economic data releases, it was a fairly quiet day in the market.

First, the scoreboard:

And now, the top stories:

Please Note: Business Insider will never share your information with any other companies. You also have the ability to unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time simply by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Matthew Boesler on Twitter. Tags: Closing Bell | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

The First Baby Is Here Whose Doctor Got Paid In Bitcoin

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post. The world's first Bitcoin baby is here and adorable.

That's thanks to Dr. C. Terence Lee, a California-based fertility specialist and Bitcoin aficionado. Lee offered a couple with whom he had worked with before a 50% discount if they would go along with his dream of fostering a Bitcoin retail economy (of babies). As CNN Money's Stacy Cowley reports:  

The child was born thanks to a frozen embryo transfer cycle paid for with bitcoins. Lee says it's the first time he's aware of that anyone has paid for fertility treatments that way.

Lee presented on his unconventional fertility methods at the Bitcoin 2013 conference.

Apparently Lee is just in it for the love of the Bitcoin game. The digital currency's recent crash doesn't bother him at all.

Lee claims he wouldn't care if his bitcoins lost their value entirely -- he and his staff are having fun figuring out the technology, meeting new people, and enjoying the economic novelty of a whole new kind of currency. He's even managed to convert a few more of his clients.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Steven Perlberg on Twitter. Tags: Bitcoin | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

Lululemon CEO Christine Day Is Stepping Down

Lululemon CEO Christine Day is stepping down.

Shares are tanking on the news.

Day has been the head of luxury yoga-wear maker Lululemon since 2008. Before that, she worked as an executive at Starbucks.

The board has hired an executive search committee, and Day will stay on as CEO until her replacement is chosen, the company said today.

"Being a part of Lululemon for the past five and a half years has been an incredible journey. I am proud of building a world class team that has produced one of the best growth, brand and profit stories in retail," Day said in a company release.

"Plans have been laid for the next five years and a vision set for the next ten. Now is the right time to bring in a CEO who will drive the next phase of Lululemon's development and growth. I will continue to actively lead the organization while the Board searches for a new CEO, and will work to ensure a smooth transition," Day said.

Day's leadership was called into question after a series of quality control issues with the brand's clothing. 

The worst offense happened in March, after the retailer had to recall 17% of its black luon yoga pants for being too sheer.

That gaffe cost the company millions of dollars and resulted in the resignation of Chief Product Officer Sheree Waterson. 

The retailer figured out the source of the problem and has started re-stocking shelves.

The company didn't say where Day plans to go next. 

Lululemon beat Wall Street's expectations during earnings today. 

Please Note: Business Insider will never share your information with any other companies. You also have the ability to unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time simply by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email

Please follow Retail on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Ashley Lutz on Twitter. Tags: Lululemon, Retail Select, Executive | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Lululemon Shares Are Tanking After CEO Announces She Will Step Down (LULU)

Yoga clothing retailer Lululemon just reported earnings, and the stock is tanking.

The numbers aren't bad – the company beat expectations on earnings and revenue – but the CEO used the opportunity to announce that she would be stepping down.

Shares are down 9% in after-hours trading.

Below is the full text from the press release.

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- lululemon athletica inc. [NASDAQ:LULU; TSX:LLL] today announced financial results for the first quarter ended May 5, 2013. lululemon also announced today that after a five and half year tenure Christine Day will step down as the Company's Chief Executive Officer when a successor is named. The Board has formed a search committee and enacted its CEO succession plan. Ms. Day's decision is being announced at this time so the Board has the benefit of a healthy transition period, and can openly use that time for a thorough search for the next CEO.

"Being a part of lululemon for the past five and a half years has been an incredible journey. I am proud of building a world class team that has produced one of the best growth, brand and profit stories in retail," said Ms. Day. "Plans have been laid for the next five years and a vision set for the next ten. Now is the right time to bring in a CEO who will drive the next phase of lululemon's development and growth. I will continue to actively lead the organization while the Board searches for a new CEO, and will work to ensure a smooth transition."

"Christine has been an exceptional leader for lululemon, successfully embracing the culture while growing the business and returning value to all of our stakeholders including our guests, employees, partners and shareholders," said Chip Wilson, Chairman of the lululemon Board of Directors. "I thank Christine for her leadership, contributions and commitment to lululemon. I am confident that we will find the right person to lead this strong team and continue to build on this excellent foundation."

RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED MAY 5, 2013

Commenting on events of the first quarter Ms. Day added: "The past quarter has been one of the most important in our company's history. While we regret that we had quality issues with our black luon we are proud of the organization's ability to get luon delivered back into our stores within 90 days of having pulled it from our line, all the while keeping our guests happy and engaged with the brand."

For the first quarter ended May 5, 2013:

Net revenue for the quarter increased 21% to $345.8 million from $285.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.Comparable stores sales for the first quarter increased by 7% on a constant dollar basis.Direct to consumer revenue increased 40% to $54.0 million, or 15.6% of total Company revenues, in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, an increase from 13.5% of total Company revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.Gross profit for the quarter increased 9% to $170.7 million, including a provision of $17.5 million for inventories charged to cost of sales related to the pull-back of black luon pants, and as a percentage of net revenue gross profit decreased to 49.4% for the quarter from 55.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.Income from operations for the quarter decreased 10% to $65.9 million, and as a percentage of net revenue was 19.1% compared to 25.6% of net revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.The tax rate for the quarter was 29.8% compared to 36.5% a year ago. The lower effective rate reflects the ongoing impact of revised intercompany pricing agreements.Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.32 on net income of $47.3 million, compared to diluted earnings per share of$0.32 on net income of $46.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

The Company ended the first quarter of fiscal 2013 with $588.4 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $424.3 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Inventory at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2013 totaled $143.7 million compared to $107.7 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company ended the quarter with 218 stores in North America and Australia.

Updated Outlook

For the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we expect net revenue to be in the range of $340 million to $345 million based on a comparable-store sales percentage increase of 5% to 7% on a constant-dollar basis. Diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of $0.33 to$0.35 for the quarter. This assumes 146.0 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding and a 30.0% tax rate.

For the full fiscal 2013, we now expect net revenue to be in the range of $1,645 million to $1,665 million and diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of $1.96 to $2.01 for the full year. This assumes 146.2 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding and a tax rate of 30.0%.

Voluntarily Delist from Toronto Stock Exchange

The Company has provided written notice to the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") regarding the delisting of its common stock. The Company anticipates that its common stock will be delisted from the TSX at the close of trading on June 24, 2013. The Company believes that the minimal trading volume of its shares on the TSX no longer justifies the expenses and administrative efforts associated with maintaining this dual listing. The Company's listing with NASDAQ provides its shareholders with sufficient liquidity, as NASDAQ accounts for nearly all of the Company's current trading volume. Further, administrative and regulatory efficiencies will be achieved by focusing on the single listing. The Company's common stock will continue to be listed and trade on NASDAQ and its Canadian shareholders will be able to continue to trade through their brokers on that market.


View the original article here

Sunday, July 28, 2013

There's A Funny Sentiment Shift About Apple Stock On Wall Street Right Now

Earlier in the week I wrote a post previewing AAPL’s Word Wide Developers Conference (below) where the title suggested that expectations were high.  Let me clarify a little bit, they are only high because the company and Tim Cook in particular have their back against the wall a bit given what appears to be a lull in product innovation since Steve Jobs death in late 2011.

As I write, AAPL is down nearly 2% on the week, making back about a percent off of this mornings lows after flirting with the stock’s 50 day moving average.   At this point I think it is safe to say that when Tim Cook takes the stage for the keynote address on Monday afternoon expectations for tangible new products are not running high.  Most of the speculation over the last few weeks has surrounded on the operating system improvements and potential services like iRadio and possibly electronic payments.

It is my strong belief that investors will be disappointed by AAPL merely updating their software and services to a place that many in the “Technorati” already feel Android is.  If in fact there is no “WOW” moment at WWDC the next identifiable catalyst will be fiscal Q3 earnings that will fall in late July and Aug expiration.

I am clearly not a raging bull on the stock and think that this summer, possibly prior to earnings the stock could retest the $400 level on the mere fact that product news remains allusive.  That being said I would likely be a long term buyer of the stock on the next re-test.

But here is the thing, it appears that the investment world is in universal agreement that the lows are in, and from what I can tell from the financial press, Twitter, communication with investors and pundits, everyone and their mother is Long….again.  In the last month, Leon Cooperman and just recently Jeff Gundlach on CNBC’s Halftime report Tuesday, suggested they are long and that the stock has bottomed, and if you agree with them, and you are long… a levered overwrite could be the way to add some juice to your position without additional risk, aside from being called away at a much higher level (which is good!)

Theoretical Trade Against a Long Stock Position:

-Buy 1 Aug 475 call for ~10.00

-Sell 2 Aug 500 calls at ~5.00 each or 10.00 total

Break-Even on Aug Expiration:

-Profits of stock btwn 441 and 500, profits of up to 25 btwn 475 and 500, max gain of 25 if stock is 500 or higher.  In that instance your long stock would be called away with 59 profits plus an additional 25, which would equal an added 5.5%.  Btwn 441 and 475 just the profits of the stock and the ratio call spread expires worthless.

-Losses of the stock below 441.

Payout Diagram:

Screen Shot 2013-06-07 at 12.26.46 PM 100 shares AAPL vs Aug 475/500 call 1×2 from TradeMonster

As you can see from the chart, the 1×2 acts to juice your long to 500, a level that would provide stuff resistance if AAPL manages a summer rally or pops on August earnings. This is a great structure if you bought the stock down here and would use 500 as a level to exit… it is also a great structure if you are long the stock higher and wish to get some of your money back on a rally back to 500.

Trade Rationale:  To summarize Jeff Gundlach in his interview with Scott Wapner on the Fast Money Halftime show on Tuesday:  Gundlach thinks sentiment is poor, the stock is cheap,  technicals show a base and cash distribution should offer support.  Here are some quotes:  ”it is too cheap”, and $500 should be a fairly easy place for the stock to go to” and ” basing out in a way that is fairly encouraging” he thinks “stock is a nice inclusion at current levels given low PE”.

That’s how I chose the strikes, to get to $500, earnings and guidance will need to be one of the catalysts.

Update -Video from Options Action on CNBC Friday June 7th discussing AAPL’s WWDC & the options strategy that I detailed above:

Original Post:  MorningWord 6/5/13:  WWDC & Great Expectations – $AAPL 

MorningWord 6/5/13:   This coming Monday in San Francisco, AAPL CEO Tim Cook will take the stage at the company’s World Wide Developers Conference “WWDC”, and make no mistake about it, expectations are running hot. Despite the strong likelihood of little new tangible product news.  Last Thursday, Enis highlighted Goldman Sachs’ derivative research team’s suggestion (here) to buy June 450 calls in front of the event, as they expect:

this event to once again be a positive catalyst for shares – this time driven by refreshes of existing services (iCloud and Siri) and/or a preview of the new iOS7 operating system. The options market has underestimated the positive nature of this event in the past. Over the past 10 years, looking from 10 days prior to WWDC to 1 day after, shares averaged a +5% return and implied volatility rose by +7% (average)

Well the stock hasn’t quite run just yet, at least not on anticipation of the event, and AAPL’s ytd performance remains a massive outlier on the downside (-15.5% ytd), just as it had on the upside in its amazing bull run up to last year.  But just as many have called for a long term bottom in AAPL of late, the one month chart below shows some fairly peculiar behavior starting off with the ~10% peak to trough correction, for apparently no reason, starting on May 8th and ending on May 16th and the subsequent 7.5% rebound that has seen the stock forming a decent base at near term support.

AAPL 1 Month chart from Bloomberg AAPL 1 Month chart from Bloomberg

Given next week’s conference and the potential for a positive catalyst to be announced, many market technicians have suggested that the stock could have recently made a Reverse Head & Shoulders bottom as we previously referenced  courtesy of Greg Bender of Bloomberg on May 30th.

AAPL 1 yr chart from Bloomberg AAPL 1 yr chart from Bloomberg

IN my early run through of product expectations from Wall Street and from the Blogosphere, it appears that few expect anything meaningful on the hardware front (possibly new MacBooks per BGR.com), while most are focused on a major upgrade of iOS (per GS via BusinesInsider.com) and added services like the rumored Pandora “Killer”, iRadio (per AppleInsider.com) or fingerprint scanning (here).

If you are buying the stock or calls for a trade into the event, my sense is that if there is any excitement it is probably going to come in the lead up to the event.  If the only material product additions are in fact software or services to be released in the fall I worry that there are few catalysts if any to own the stock (aside from share repurchase) between now and the iPhone launch in late Sept.

There are 3 things I would like to see happen in the days prior to WWDC, a rally back to resistance at or around $470, a selloff to 420 and/or an implied volatility spike.   A vol spike would be a nice opportunity to sell short dated vol and the price move could provide a nice entry to play for a reversal back in range.

Yesterday on CNBC’s Fast Money Halftime Report with Scott Wapner, investor Jeff Gundlach, who was short AAPL last year, recently just bought the stock around $405 and gave his reasoning for it:

To Sum Up, Gundlach thinks sentiment is poor, the stock is cheap,  technicals show a base and cash distribution should offer support.  Here are some quotes:  ”it is too cheap”, and $500 should be a fairly easy place for the stock to go to” and ” basing out in a way that is fairly encouraging” he thinks “stock is a nice inclusion at current levels given low PE”.

What’s most interesting is that Gundlach did not once mention the words new products in that interview.  That is what is going to drive the stock back above $500.  He did say that it is unlikely the stock sees $700 anytime soon, but given the market’s ytd rise and the unprecedented cash distribution plan, I would suggest that the stock is gonna need something more than buybacks, dividends & low PE to get this pig back to unchanged on the year ($532.17).

Last week at the WSJ’s All Things D conf, the most telling thing thing Tim Cook said on the product front was, “The wrist is interesting,” (here at 6:35pm) alluding to their probable entrance to the wearable computing market.  I am not sure this is gonna do it in 2013, if iWatch is the the iThingy that restores innovation. Don’t get me wrong, there are many technical aspects about AAPL the stock that are getting increasingly attractive, but some of the core fundamentals characteristics of the company, that have driven the stock’s success in the last decade still remain allusive.  I am still in the camp that a retest of the previous lows, possibly in front of, or after fiscal Q3 earnings in late July could be the appropriate spot to set up for a second half  of 2013 that could see refreshes and additions to iPad, iPhone and possibly something in the living-room.


View the original article here

Canadian Households Getting More And More Leveraged

By international standards, Canada survived the financial crisis pretty well.

Now we're seeing indications that our neighbor to the north was only delaying the inevitable. Canadians are way more indebted than Americans (via Matt Phillips):

canadian debtStatistics Canada

Canadian banks may have gone bailout free during the credit crisis, but household debt has now spiked to a record 165% of disposable income.

While U.S. home prices plummeted in the wake of the crisis, and are just now starting to show signs of life, Canada's house prices have risen a ridiculous 123% since January 2000.

We're seeing a classic housing bubble near burst, with Toronto home sales slumping 10% in the first half of May while prices simultaneously climbed 5.4% like it was no big deal.

Canada's economists may try to cushion worry with talk of a "soft landing" of future price drops, but the country is highly levered and its homes are crazy overvalued.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Steven Perlberg on Twitter. Tags: Canada, Housing, Housing Bubble | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

NYSE Trader Explains How Dow Theory Works

Earlier this year Dow Theorists were looking at transportation stocks or "trannies" and saying it was a good time to buy.

The idea is that the durability of a rally depends on the strength of stock indexes. When the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Dow Transportation Average move in tandem, depending on the direction, they signal a buy or a sell.

The idea has six underlying principles.

Mark Newton of Greywolf Equity Partners walks us through the basics of Dow Theory:

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Mamta Badkar on Twitter.
Ask Mamta A Question » Tags: TBI Live, BI Original Video, Video, NYSE, Dow Theory, Market | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Wall Street Research Has A New Problem

You probably know the story — in the '90s Wall Street got carried away (to say the least) with the tech boom and the Chinese wall between its analysts' research and investment banking was crossed.

Since then, the Street's research has slowly won back some of its credibility, but former hot-shot Merrill Lynch analyst, Richard Bernstein — who now oversees $1.3 billion at his own firm, Richard Bernstein Advisors — still doesn't buy it. His interview in last weekend's issue of Barron's breaks down his thoughts.

To Bernstein, the problem isn't credibility. Now the problem is that Wall Street research is all basically the same stuff.

From Barron's (this is a Q&A, the italicized questions are from Barron's reporter, Lawrence Strauss):

You can show me a report, you can take off the banner, and I would have no idea who wrote it. It is very hard to differentiate one person's research from another's. "We don't care about individual names. We care about getting size, style, country, and sector right."

Is there anyone, in particular, whose work you like?

Michael Goldstein at Empirical Research Partners was one of my biggest competitors when I was on the sell side, and now we subscribe to his work. He is very good. But most of the Street research is remarkably similar, with very little value added, so we don't use a lot of outside research. About 95% of what we do is our own research, and there are only maybe three or four people whose work we subscribe to.

Has Wall Street research changed a lot since you started your career in 1981?

It has. If I want to find a strategy report on Botswana, I can find it on the Street now. Wall Street has a strategist for every country and product you can name. So the research has gotten broader. However, the depth has gotten so shallow, it is absolutely ridiculous. The strategists I always looked up to -- people like Chuck Clough of Merrill Lynch and Lee Cooperman and Steve Einhorn of Omega Advisors -- weren't necessarily tremendously broad. I am not sure they could tell you what was going on in industrial production in Botswana. But the depth of their research was fantastic.

So there you have it — one bank's research may be just as good as another.

The lesson here is, as ever, do your own homework.


View the original article here

There's A Great Economics Experiment Happening Right Now, And It Proves That QE Works

Continue to Business Insider »

You will be redirected in seconds.

Enter your email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.You have successfully emailed the post.

There is a great natural economic experiment unfolding. And it is not the QE3 versus U.S. fiscal austerity debate that some of us have been debating. Rather, it is the United States versus the Eurozone and the different policy "treatments" their economies are receiving. Jim Pethokoukis explains:

[W]e have an intriguing natural economic experiment. Two large, advanced economies are both undergoing fiscal austerity from spending cuts and tax increases. But one is recovering, though glacially, from a previous downturn; the other is deteriorating.

The likely difference: monetary policy. Not only did the Federal Reserve slash short-term interest rates to nearly zero way back in 2008, but it has also embarked upon a massive bond-buying program known as quantitative easing. The European Central Bank, however, only last month cut its key interest rate to 0.5 percent, still higher than the Fed-funds rate. And the ECB’s “unconventional” monetary policy has been far more modest, with bond purchases less than a tenth the size of the Fed’s. Its goals have also been more limited: stabilizing southern Europe’s debt markets and avoiding a financial crisis. At a recent speech in Frankfurt, Germany, St. Louis Fed president James Bullard said that unless Europe adopts an aggressive bond-buying program, it risks an extended period of low growth and deflation like what Japan has experienced since the 1980s.

This policy treatment explains the different NGDP trajectories in this figure:

ngdpgrowthMacro and Other Market Musings

What is puzzling to me is how anyone could look at the outcome of this experiment and claim the Fed's large scale asset programs (LSAPs) are not helpful. Some claim the LSAPs are just helping the rich, at best, and may even be deflationary. But it is not hard to imagine how much higher U.S. unemployment would be were it not for the Fed's QE programs. Just look to Europe's unemployment rate, as noted by Pethokoukis. Yes, the LSAP programs are far from ideal but they are keeping Americans from experiencing the unemployment seen in Europe.  In other words, QE is helping the lives of ordinary working people in the Unites States. And there are many ordinary working Europeans whose lives would be much better off if the ECB were to more closely follow the Fed's actions. 

The insights from this natural experiment should give QE critics pause. And so should the fact that these these programs are helping shore up the supply of safe assets. Critics who see the slow recovery and point to the Fed's LSAPs simply are not doing the right (if any) counterfactual.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook. Tags: Quantitative Easing | Get Alerts for these topics »

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog. The term quantitative easing (QE) describes a form of monetary policy used by central banks to increase the supply of money in an economy when the bank interest rate, discount rate and/or interbank interest rate are either at... More » David Beckworth is assistant professor of economics at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Kentucky. I am using this blog as an outlet to express my ideas, concerns, and questions on macroeconomics and markets.

You are logged into Facebook

Social: |Your Activity | These articles have been shared on your timeline. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.

You are logged in with Google

Social: |
Your Activity | These articles have been added to your Google activity log. You can remove them here: Options Notify me when a story is shared.
Get Business Insider Mobile

View the original article here

CHART OF THE DAY: Explaining The Complete And Utter Collapse Of Chinese 'Exports' To Hong Kong

China's exports to Hong Kong grew just 7.7% in May, down from 57.2% in April and a whopping 92.9% in March. Overall exports grew just 1%.

Why the huge drop?

At the time of the big gains earlier in the year, analysts said it was because the export data was "the result of disguised capital inflows, as exporters could overstate export amount in order to move yuan into the mainland."

On May 5, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) announced that it would crack down on companies that used "merchandise trade invoices for arbitrage activities, and announced the introduction of strict limits on how much onshore banks can short or lend the US dollar," wrote Societe Generale's Wei Yao.

The sudden collapse reflects the effectiveness of the government's crackdown on disguised arbitrage flows.

china exportBusiness Insider

Please Note: Business Insider will never share your information with any other companies. You also have the ability to unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time simply by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Mamta Badkar on Twitter.
Ask Mamta A Question » Tags: Chart Of The Day, China, Hong Kong, Export | Get Alerts for these topics »

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

x

The Chart of the Day widget displays the latest published chart from Business Insider. To embed, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here